Blog Layout

Remote Service Delivery Options Rise to the Occasion for Career Seekers Transitioning into Reemployment

Hallie Leverich-Purvis, Sr. Marketing & Communications Team Lead, Geographic Solutions  Evan Brenner, Digital Content Specialist, Geographic Solutions.



The pandemic radically altered business practices all over the world. As a result, workforce development agencies across the country and beyond have been moved to explore creative solutions that allow staff, job seekers, and employers to connect, interact virtually, and conduct business remotely – all while remaining at a safe social distance.


During the pandemic, agencies faced a crushing amount of traffic to their labor exchange and unemployment insurance systems. Contributing to the crushing weight was a nationwide shortage of staff due to sickness, burnout, and social distancing guidelines. Virtual live chat platforms became instrumental in serving large volumes of individuals, filtering them in an organized fashion through a queue, and directing the individual to the appropriate staff member who would be able to serve their needs.


Live Chat Emerges as Key Remote Service Delivery Avenue


The North Carolina Department of Commerce’s Division of Workforce Solutions (NC DWS) had great success serving individuals via their live chat platform. The first hurdle that the state faced was providing agency staff members with remote tools that they could use to deliver services at a distance. For a time, like many organizations, NCWorks Career Centers (the state’s American Job Centers) were not serving any customers in person.


In Geographic Solutions’ February 2021 Pathways to Employment webinar, the NC DWS Information Technology Director, Michael Hoskins, described how his organization pivoted at the height of the pandemic to provide remote services.


“(Our live chat was) set up so that when an individual logs into NCWorks, they will see in the bottom right-hand corner a ‘live chat’ option,” said Hoskins. “When they click on ‘live chat,’ they will then be directed to one of the assigned staff that are logged in.”


While a live chat setup can seem rather standard, models differ from state-to-state based on the need, environment, and staff resources.


“In North Carolina, we may have 100 or more people logged in at any one time,” said Hoskins. “The way it would work is when somebody would chat, it would send it to the next available person on that list.”


But, as Hoskins described during the webinar event, they needed to make some unique changes to the live chat model to make it work for North Carolina’s unique brand of service delivery and case management.


“We submitted a request to make some changes,” said Hoskins. “Now, if an individual goes to chat, the first person they connect them to is their case manager.”


Making these changes helped Hoskins and his team at DWS assign case managers in the system remotely in their Trade or Title I applications. It allowed the individual to reach out directly, and at a distance, to their case manager.


But what happens if a case manager isn’t logged on? The system was set up to look for somebody else in the same office as the case manager.


“It was a quick way that we could get people to connect to the staff that were working remotely,” said Hoskins.


Remote Job Fairs: An Opportunity for Relevance and Distanced Service Delivery


Virtual job fairs emerged as one of the more creative, remote, and versatile – avenues that American Job Centers were able to make use of in their effort to maintain high service delivery outcomes, and expanded hiring radii, while safeguarding everyone’s health.


As companies explored non-traditional hiring methods, these virtual platforms rose to the challenge as successful ways to bring hiring fairs directly to the applicant, breaking down geographic boundaries, and appealing to a much broader talent pool who were willing and able to work anywhere. Virtual job fairs were also utilized to target certain demographics, professions, and industries who were conducting small to large hiring campaigns.


At the height of the pandemic, Recruitics, a data-powered recruitment marketing platform, conducted research on virtual job fairs. Their results showed that 45 percent of employers turned to virtual hiring events. And the Society for Human Resource Management, or SHRM, found similar results while surveying industry professionals. Their May 2020 article highlighted the increase of technology use for hiring events as a result of the pandemic’s onset.


Upskilling in a Virtual World


In areas where workforce agency staff were able to extend their hiring arm with virtual job fairs, a new challenge emerged – upskilling or reskilling, and coaching individuals in interview etiquette. Mass layoffs due to COVID caused unprecedented restructuring on where and how individuals could find employment. Some recently unemployed had to readjust their approach and explore careers and employment that they sometimes had no prior experience in, thus bringing in the need for online learning platforms offering courses for in-demand occupations.


These virtual tools allowed individuals to gain the skills they needed to close their skills gaps, explore career pathways, connect with employers remotely, to gain confidence and better prepare themselves to succeed in a sometimes-over-saturated job market as the nation slowly returned to work.


Paper and Pen Get a Digital Makeover


The NC DWS was able to integrate remote digital signatures into some of their applications – specifically Title I, Wagner-Peyser, and Trade applications. This provided a very simple and efficient way for both staff and individuals to sign forms remotely, and a way for staff to send a message to an individual located at home. The individual would get a text message, an email, or an alert message notifying them that there was a document that needed their signature.


They would view the document and quickly provide a signature across a number of mediums (signature by mouse, audio voice or other audible signature methods, as well as by PIN code. Once entered, the signature is applied and stored digitally.


In our February Pathways to Employment webinar series on remote service delivery, Hoskins, the IT Director in North Carolina shared that his agency staff members were able to eliminate multiple platforms. And adding features that allowed signing documents remotely simplified the process and reduced their overall operating cost.


“(Adding) made it a secure way that we can get information,” said Hoskins. “And, the nice thing (is), if an individual is on their telephone, they get a text message, they can view and sign the application right on the telephone,” said Hoskins. “So, it makes it very simple for the individual.”


Virtual Service Delivery: The Boost We All Need for Reemployment


Whether these tools become core service delivery solutions or a way to complement in-person services, there is no doubt remote service options offer flexibility to serve populations in hard-to-reach regions. By employing virtual service delivery tools, American Job Centers are able to expand their reach and effectiveness when offering assistance to individuals seeking reemployment.

Share This Post:

By Brad Turner-Little 10 Apr, 2024
House-Passed WIOA Bill Misses the Mark
By Stacy Heit 02 Apr, 2024
Recommendations F rom the Workforce Trans formation Policy Council
By NAWB 28 Mar, 2024
Forum 2024 Highlights
By Stacy Heit 29 Feb, 2024
2024 NAWB Award Winners Announced
By Stacy Heit 12 Dec, 2023
NAWB responded to the latest WIOA reauthorization proposal on Dec. 12, 2023, in a letter addressed to the chair and ranking member of the House Education and the Workforce Committee. Read the full letter below. Dear Chair Foxx and Ranking Member Scott, On behalf of the National Association of Workforce Boards (NAWB), representing more than 590 state and local workforce development boards (WDBs) across the nation, I am writing in response to the committee’s recent introduction and consideration of H.R. 6655, A Stronger Workforce for America Act (ASWA) to outline our organization’s reservations regarding core aspects of this draft proposal as well as to highlight other, more encouraging, elements of the legislation that we believe would have a positive impact on WDB operations and the wider publicly funded workforce system. Reauthorization of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) is of critical importance to our organization and our members, particularly at a time of significant change in the wider economy and labor markets. Updating the primary federal investment in WIOA provides Congress an important opportunity to make changes to this legislation to ensure that workers, learners, and employers have a system that is nimble, flexible, and responsive to their needs. As ASWA continues to advance through the legislative process, we look forward to working with you as you and your colleagues further refine and build upon this draft proposal using the recommendations and perspectives outlined throughout this letter. NAWB shares your desire to get more training out of the publicly funded workforce system. However, we strenuously disagree with the proposed strategy contained in ASWA—a narrowly defined federal training mandate—to achieve this vision for the future. Such a mandate is at odds with the state and local governance structure that has long been a hallmark of the primary federal investment in workforce development. Congress has long empowered states and local entities to deliver the programs and services authorized by WIOA due to their proximity to the people being served. State and local WDBs’ understanding of the unique employment needs of the diverse communities they serve is necessary to effectively meet the challenges facing individuals with barriers to employment. A federal mandate, however, removes agency from states and local entities to do this in ways that make sense for their communities, regardless of the actual needs of the populations that must be prioritized by the publicly funded workforce system. As you know, the populations that are most frequently served by WIOA face some of the greatest barriers to finding and obtaining family-sustaining employment. These populations are not often in a position to immediately enter into education and skills development programs without significant wraparound services and supports to ensure their success. The proposed mandate’s structure does not acknowledge this important reality and has the potential for many unintended consequences that are likely at odds with this stated core goal of ASWA. This is especially true because the mandate proposed in this draft legislation is narrowly defined and does not allow for the provision of supports to ensure participant success. If enacted as currently constructed, this mandate has the potential to prevent individuals that need help from WIOA the most from accessing the supportive services and resources they need to be successful in education and skills development experiences that lead to better opportunities for themselves and their families. Put more plainly—while well intentioned, the currently proposed training mandate does not adequately address the need to provide the supports necessary to ensure participant success. Non-completion of mandated levels of training will not help workers nor does it help employers seeking to meet their talent needs. NAWB is also concerned that these challenges would be exacerbated by the proposed funding levels contained in the legislation. While we are appreciative of the new funding from H-1B visa fees envisioned in this legislation for Individual Training Accounts (ITAs) to address the requirements of the proposed training mandate, these funds are variable on an annual basis and are likely to ebb and flow each year based on changes to policy contexts that are difficult to predict. In addition, ASWA proposes only modest increases in authorized appropriations for Title I funding despite historic levels of underinvestment and disinvestment in WIOA and predecessor legislation over the past several decades—the primary reason why current levels of training provided by the WIOA system remain so low. ASWA also increases the allowable percentage of funding that can be reserved by the Governor to 25 percent of all WIOA Title I formula funding, including for the creation of a Critical Industry Skills fund. While we are appreciative that LWDBs are eligible applicants for some of these funds, these changes will further reduce the resources available at the local level to deliver training services newly mandated by ASWA. NAWB agrees that providing upskilling opportunities for workers is an important employment strategy for states which is why we have consistently called for greater local flexibility to make this a reality for more workers. As currently structured, however, ASWA would allow other federal funds, including the Governor’s existing 15 percent reserve funding, to be used to meet the state matching requirement for the creation of such an initiative. This will further reduce the ability of the federal investment to leverage additional state funding for training and employment opportunities for individuals. We therefore recommend that this matching requirement be narrowed to only allow nonfederal state funding to fulfill this requirement or eliminated entirely. For reasons outlined above, NAWB strongly opposes ASWA’s fifty percent training mandate and believes that it should be eliminated or substantially lowered from its current level. In addition, we believe that if a mandate is maintained as the legislative process continues, the underlying definition for what qualifies as training for this purpose be expanded to recognize the critical role supportive services have in ensuring individuals’ success in education and skills development. Our organization’s membership also has concerns regarding the redesignation process for local workforce development areas (LWDAs) proposed in ASWA. NAWB recognizes the need to ensure that LWDAs reflect the communities that they were created to serve and provide locally developed solutions to meet the needs of individuals and employers in these same communities. This is especially important as the nation has undergone dramatic transformations over the years since the time many LWDAs were first created. Yet once triggered by a Governor ASWA’s proposed redesignation process, as currently structured, would adversely impact the geography of all LWDAs in a state, even if a majority of LWDBs in the state vote against such a proposal. NAWB believes it is imperative that an option be included to maintain current LWDA designations should a majority of LWDBs in the state vote to preserve them. Despite NAWB’s reservations regarding these aspects of legislation, which we call on Congress to address as it is further considered as part of the legislative process, there were other positive elements contained in ASWA that we believe have the potential to constructively impact the publicly funded system in important and sometimes profound ways: - Clarifying LWDBs’ budgetary authority over the administration of adult, dislocated worker, and youth workforce development activities in a LWDA. - Improved flexibility to use virtualized services and affiliated sites to deliver one-stop services, along with allowing LWDBs to serve as one-stop operators under certain circumstances. While NAWB appreciates some of the changes made to funding of one-stop infrastructure costs, we strongly believe that dedicated funding is needed for this purpose, rather than the proposed increased Title I contribution, which would have the additional benefit of freeing up more funding for training and supportive services for eligible individuals and populations. - Increasing flexibility for LWDBs to provide reskilling and upskilling opportunities for individuals and workers. - The provision of professional development opportunities for staff and members of state and local WDBs. - A clear emphasis throughout the draft on skills-based hiring initiatives and other thoughtful strategies to clear the path between job seekers and employers, including changes to skills assessments conducted during the initial intake process to reward prior work and learning experiences. - Expanding the definition for foundational skills needs to include digital literacy skills, which we believe is an important reflection regarding the role of these competencies in an increasingly digital-first world. - Formally defining co-enrollment as a way to better promote this strategy as a systemwide priority to help more individuals access and receive the services they need. - A significant overhaul of how eligible training providers (ETPs) are identified, what criteria can be used to establish and maintain provider eligibility, and how related ETP lists (ETPLs) are leveraged to ensure quality. To further improve upon this aspect of ASWA, NAWB suggests building on these positive aspects and establishing clear thresholds and related incentives to establish multistate reciprocity agreements and ensure that providers of quality training opportunities can deliver programs and services to more individuals regardless of where they may reside. - The codification of the Workforce Data Quality Initiative (WDQI) including additional funding via the national dislocated worker reserve fund to increase the program’s funding level. These resources are critical to building the workforce data infrastructure needed to make many of the improvements envisioned elsewhere in ASWA a reality. We are also greatly appreciative of the changes made in ASWA that will enhance access to wage record information needed to reliably and accurately assess program and system performance. - Changes to the Title I youth funding stream, including a more inclusive definition for opportunity youth (OY) and the ability to use ITAs for youth populations. While we were encouraged to note that the mandated split of funds between eligible youth populations has now been modified to be statewide, we believe greater flexibility should be provided regarding this requirement. - Data transparency requirements, including an emphasis on the use of linked, open, and interoperable data schema throughout the draft that will dramatically improve workforce data quality and subsequent use by a variety of stakeholders, including promoting a key tenet of WIOA and carried forward by ASWA—informed consumer choice. - Allowing for public outreach and marketing of federally funded workforce initiatives to increase the public’s awareness of and familiarity with these opportunities. Importantly, this list is not exhaustive and there are other elements of ASWA that are not included above that NAWB has been encouraged to note. At the same time, we understand that this proposal is the first step in a wider reauthorization process. We look forward to working with you and your colleagues in the House, as well as the Senate, to build upon the important and encouraging elements contained in this draft proposal and noted elsewhere in this letter. Should you have any questions regarding these perspectives or NAWB’s wider policy recommendations related to WIOA please do not hesitate to contact myself at (turner-littleb@nawb.org) at your convenience. Sincerely, Bradford Turner-Little CEO National Association of Workforce Boards 
By Stacy Heit 07 Dec, 2023
NAWB shared its support for the Advancing Research in Education Act (AREA)—legislation that would reauthorize and make important updates to the Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA). Read the full text below. Dear Chair Sanders and Ranking Member Cassidy, On behalf of the National Association of Workforce Boards (NAWB), representing more than 590 state and local workforce development boards (WDBs) across the nation, I am writing in strong support of S. 3392, the Advancing Research in Education Act (AREA)—legislation that would reauthorize and make important updates to the Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA). If enacted this bipartisan legislation would significantly improve the research and data functions carried out by federal agencies in support of the full education and workforce development continuum. LWDBs oversee, at the local level, activities and programs within the publicly funded workforce system and as such have a deep appreciation for the need for quality, timely, and actionable data to support workers’ many needs on their journey to family-sustaining employment. We greatly appreciate the committee’s bipartisan recognition that efforts to more fully understand and improve education must necessarily include a stronger focus on the subsequent labor market and workforce outcomes of students. Understanding what happens to students after they leave a classroom can help to align national education and workforce goals, improve the development of curriculum and delivery of instruction, and would support students as they navigate an increasingly more complex economy that is undergoing dramatic changes. NAWB was especially encouraged to note the following provisions contained in AREA that support these wider goals and objectives: - An explicit focus on postsecondary education and workforce development as a research topic for the National Center for Education Research’s development centers; - Broadening the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioner for Education Statistics to include a focus on postsecondary, workforce, and adult education, including promoting data sharing and linkages across education and training systems; - Promoting voluntary guidelines to standardize data and information and ensure interoperability which would greatly increase the utility and usability of this information for a variety of stakeholders; - Significant and much-needed reforms to the State Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) grant program, including more explicit incorporation of workforce data and related labor market outcomes, especially as it relates to the generation of accurate and timely data needed to support the implementation of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA); and - Directing federal agencies to provide technical assistance to state and local WDBs to support ongoing and effective implementation of education and workforce development investments. Encouragingly there were many other aspects of S. 3392 that NAWB was pleased to note and we are incredibly grateful for the time and energy the committee has devoted reauthorizing ESRA so far. We look forward to working with you and your colleagues to advance this important proposal and look forward to its enactment. Sincerely, Bradford C. Turner-Little, CEO National Association of Workforce Boards
22 Nov, 2023
A Message of Thanks to Our Members from Our CEO
By Melanie Anderson 01 Aug, 2023
NAWB Names Brad Turner-Little President and CEO
By Ron Painter 30 Jun, 2023
A Farewell Tribute: Unpacking 14 Years of Success at NAWB
By Ron Painter 10 Mar, 2023
Statement from NAWB CEO Ron Painter on the Biden Administration’s FY24 Congressional Budget Request
More Posts
Share by: